- Rssb satsang tour 2014 how to#
- Rssb satsang tour 2014 full#
- Rssb satsang tour 2014 pro#
- Rssb satsang tour 2014 free#
Rumiton 13:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your opinion Rumiton. If there are not enough unbiased scholars who have looked at the subject then the Wiki article should probably be reduced, by consent of all involved, to a very short form (a stub.) Then get on with something more constructive in your lives.
Rssb satsang tour 2014 pro#
Mixing pro and anti sentiments in the article does not achieve this either, it resembles schizophrenia, and the two factions will fight to the death on the Discussion pages. Perhaps it takes many years for the pendulum to centre itself, perhaps it never happens, but what is required on Wikipedia is neutral, scholarly appraisal, which they are unlikely to provide. Re the apostates, I feel personally sympathetic, but it seems that when someone has committed themselves passionately to a group, its beliefs or its leader, then he/she loses that commitment, there is nearly always an equally passionate and sincere reversal of loyalty. I have not been involved here, and know little of the particular subject, but in the general area of minority religions on Wikipedia I understand that there is a problem with the testimony of both acolytes and apostates. But the distinction between the Beas line and the others (including Paul Twitchel's westernized version) is important and must be respected. My conclusion is that there ought to be links from the four spiritual traditions I mentioned in paragraph two. This issue of whether Sant Mat ought to be called a religion is a hot topic, with the default being "spiritual path." Satsangis I know are acutely sensitive of this distinction, and it is discussed
I practiced for five years and then returned to Anglicanism, but with a broader understanding of spirituality, and a place where Eastern thought and practice is not uncommon.
Rssb satsang tour 2014 full#
In the spirit of full disclosure, I was an initiate at a very young age of Charan Singh. Also, consider the growth of the the Beas tradition in the West. Beas is different than the Agra line, and so on. I agree that although the lineage of the RSSB is important to the context of Indian spiritual traditions, specifically the confluence of Hindu-Buddhist-Muslim-Sikh, the abject confusion over the various branches of "The Path" needs clarification.
Rssb satsang tour 2014 free#
In the free spirit of wikipedia, don't they have a say on this page? Or this sect is scared that posting controversies will effect their membership Why is that every time somebody posts any controversy related to RSSB, it is deleted from this page? Are we trying to make this page an official propaganda (or newsletter) of RSSB? There are ex-followers, who followed this faith for more than 30 years and now left this faith as they got disillusioned. This is wikipedia and not RSSB's official newsletter. Please provide "any definition of religion" from a reputed source and prove your point, instead of making conjectures! -Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.156.11 ( talk) 21:55, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Why only one sided view on this page By any definition of the word, "religion", it is. I don't understand the arguments claiming RSSB is not a religion. So, I think one should not use a term like religion this mat. Goal of life which is nothing but to unite with the master.Īnd we never profess ourselves to be sikhs.
Rssb satsang tour 2014 how to#
Our master teaches us the path of sant mat and how to reach the ultimate I think you are mixing SANT MAT with religions like HINDUISM, SIKHISM
Lane has additional information on this lineage, as he was an initiate of a Beas Guru named Charan Singh (guru). I started this article so that people interested in RSSB can create a proper article instead of changing the Sant Mat article to look like RSSB is Sant Mat, when most of the objective activity (books, Gurus, disciples) have long ago abandoned the Beas line. 11 This article reads like a pamphlet for the religion.6 Radha Soami and RSSB are not the same thing.5 radha swamiji dyal ki dya radha soamiji sahai.3 It should not be merged with Radhasoami section.